🔗 Share this article

Iran is willing to resume atomic discussions with the United States provided that it is treated with "dignity" and "respect", Tehran's foreign minister has announced.

The Iranian diplomat declared exclusively dialogue was effective, and revealed recent overtures had been made by intermediaries to reopen negotiations with the Trump administration. He said Iran had zero undeclared nuclear sites, and Iran could not yet permit the UN nuclear inspectorate to visit attacked atomic facilities for security reasons.

Walking a Challenging Course

The foreign minister is navigating a difficult route since Iran aims to avoid be seen to be acting from a stance of vulnerability, and he emphatically stated that Iran had emerged stronger in military terms and psychologically from the coordinated strike on its nuclear sites in June.

He was addressing at a security conference in Tehran where he reiterated that Iran had "an inalienable right to process nuclear material domestically that it will never give up" – the primary cause of the deadlock in the prior discussions.

Earlier Negotiations Unexpectedly Terminated

The previous five rounds of talks between the United States and Iran were brought to an abrupt and hostile termination on 12 June when the Israeli government, with US support, struck Tehran's atomic facilities in a fortnight-long engagement that culminated with Donald Trump claiming the locations had been obliterated. Afterward, EU nations used their privilege to restore UN-wide sanctions, but Iran insists they have not had a major impact.

Ideal Resolution Suggested

Iranian officials stated they felt they had achieved a "ideal resolution" to the enrichment issue in prior discussions, when it was decided an domestic cooperative with American involvement could enrich uranium. Each party would have been able to claim victory since domestic enrichment would have remained and the US could be confident that Iran's atomic project was exclusively peaceful.

It had not been decided in the negotiations that American atomic experts could work inside Iran, but that was a reasonable assumption of the consortium proposal. Officials stated three times they had achieved a deal with the US representative Steve Witkoff only for the deal to collapse due to "opponents in the US".

Current Position

Iran's diplomats declared the consortium offer was now withdrawn, but it seems highly likely the offer could be reintroduced in some form if negotiations reopen.

The American leader recently said he had been obtaining communications that Iran sought to reopen negotiations, but privately Iran's diplomats say they are not yet getting coherent offers from America either straightforwardly or from important Middle Eastern intermediaries, such as the Qatari government, Egypt, Oman and the Saudi kingdom. The Iran's state department has been accused of passivity in the face of Washington's unmediated tactics, but Tehran states negotiations is not part of a performance.

Political Stance

In his address to the forum, designed to paint the US as a controlling nation that exploits the notion of global regulations, Araghchi declared the fortnight-long engagement revealed the conflict could not be resolved by combat operations. He asserted the attacks began with a Washington's ultimatum for an complete Tehran capitulation and concluded with an absolute demand for a truce.

Iran is assured the initial Israeli attacks were executed with full US knowledge and coordination, making confidence difficult to reestablish.

Negotiations Remains the Final Solution

The foreign minister said: "It was not Iran that had abandoned negotiations; it was America and the western countries that had repeatedly attempted to enforce their desires during the discussions. Negotiations can still be viable and remains the primary solution to settle disputes, but its criteria, guidelines and principles must be adhered to."

"In case they address to the citizens of Tehran with the language of respect and respect, they will get a response in the same language."

Repair and Reconstruction

In what is described by Iranian officials as the battle of repair and reconstruction, Araghchi said he was assured Iran's security strengths "are much stronger than prior to 13 or 14 June of this year. Our entire military infrastructure have been rebuilt. We acquired multiple understandings from this engagement; we have identified our personal limitations and the weaknesses of the opponent."

He stated: "We effectively endured this conflict. Our atomic expertise, which they planned to eliminate, continues to exist. The installations and equipment, if damaged, will be reconstructed; what is important is the resolve of the citizens of Tehran and then the national cohesion that they aimed at, but failed to shatter. The citizens of Tehran have become more resilient, more integrated, and more supportive of the leadership and the country in the wake of this invasion."